Eight global assessments and outlooks in the field of environment and sustainable development, published in the last two years (2007-2008), have painted a concurrent picture of the world’s major challenges of environmentally sustainable development. The assessments converge in identifying the main environmental challenges in sustainable development; problems that mostly play out on a global scale and require global solutions.
download publication (PDF 0,4 MB) order publication
Authors
Kok MTJ ; Bakkes JA ; Bresser AHM ; Manders AJG ; Eickhout B ; Oorschot MMP van ; Vuuren DP van ; Wees M van ; Westhoek HJ
Report no.
500135003
Date
8 June 2009
Pages
32
Language
en
Year
2009
This report looks across these assessments for key environmental challenges, foreseen for the next decades, and for possible policy interventions for meeting them in a comprehensive manner. The eight assessments are consistent in their identification of the key issues in the management of the global environment: climate change; biodiversity loss, both terrestrial and aquatic (freshwater and marine); land-use and freshwater management, and pollution. The assessments conclude, each in its own focal area, that many technical solutions are affordable and available for achieving domestic and international targets. However, they display different perspectives on preferred policy options.
Building on earlier analyses by PBL (Lessons from global environmental assessments), this report was written at the request of UNEP, in support of the preparations for its 25th Session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum, held in February 2009. It analyses whether messages from these assessments strengthen the findings of the Global Environment Outlook (GEO-4), and what insights they add to the central theme of GEO-4: environment for development.
This report is also timely, since many of the same organisations that have commissioned the assessments analysed in this report are currently considering the focus and contents of a new round of assessments. Some thoughts on possible directions for future assessments are offered based on our experience in some of these assessments. At this point in time, a policy demand can be expected to shift the focus from ‘priority problems’ to ‘priority actions’. In other words, future assessments would have to look into the governance question of how to deal with these problems.